ON-Farm Testing
| Sl.No. | Title | Problem Diagnosed | Technology Assessed | Crop/Enterprises | No. of Trails | Results | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLANT PROTECTION | 
						||||||
| 1 | Management of Trunk borer in Mandarin Orange. | Severe infestation of Trunk Borer  |  
							
 1. Inject  5ml petrol and insert petrol soaked cotton and close it with wet mud in a bored  holes of the tree trunk.  | 
							Mandarin Orange  | 
							3 | 1.No. of infested =10 2.Fruits/tree=650 3.Yield/tree(kg)=90 4.B.C Ratio=6:1 | 
						
| 2 | Management of Fruit sucking moth in Mandarin Orange.  | 
							Severe infestation of Fruit sucking moth.  |  
							1.Preparation  of lures by mixing 20ml chlorpyriphos+ 
  | Mandarin Orange  | 
							3 | 1. Damaged fruits/tree=80 2.Fruits/tree=580 3.Yield/tree(kg)=70 4.B.C.Ratio=4:1 | 
						
HOME SCIENCE | >
						||||||
| 1 | Working Principe of Zero Energy Cool Chamber | Dure to erratic power supplybat village cannot store the perishable fruitsband vegetables for longer periods. Refrigerators are costlier tahn zecc but lower in capacity | 
						  Storage techniques  | 
						  Perishable fruits and vegetables  | 
						  2 | Fruits and vegetables can be store for longer durations. Shelf life increases | 
					    
| 2 | Post harvest processing of Banana | No value addition in raw banana | Value addition | Banana | 3 | Yield:1kg  raw banan agives 600g of Chips  | 
					    
| 3 | Post harvest processing of Soyabean | Low utilization of farm produce. | Value addition | Soyabean | 2 | Yield:1kg  grain gives 300ml of milk  | 
					    
AGRONOMY | >
						||||||
| 1 | Varietal performance of Groundnut (Var.K-6)  | Low productivity due to non availability of HYV | Varietal evaluation  | Groundnut 
  | 
							3 | 1.Germination(  % ): 99  | 
						
| 2 | Varietal Performance of Greengram Var IPM-2-14  | 
						  Low productivity due to non availability of HYV | Varietal evaluation  | 
						  Green gram | 3 | 1.Germination  (%) : 99  | 
					    
| 3 | Varietal Performance of Quality Protein Maize( Variety HQPM 1) | Low yield and less economic benefits with local variety  |  
							Varietal evaluation  | 
							Maize | 3 | 1.Method  of Sowing: line sowing 
  | 
						
HORTICULTURE | >
						||||||
| 1 | Varietal Performance of Okra(Kashi Kranti & Kashi Pragati)  | 
							Low yield of existing local variety | Varietal Evaluation  | Okra  | 
							3 | Demo.  Plot  | 
						
| 2 | Integrated Nutrient Management in Mandarin Orange | Low Yield due to improper nutrient management | INM in Orange Orchard Treatment: T1:No Fertilizer input T2:FYM(250 kgs/ha)/Vermicompost(20 qt/ha) Lime-2kg/plant+Plant growth regulator T3:Farmer practice | 
						  Mandarin Orange  | 
						  2 | Demo.Plot  | 
					    
| 3 | Integrated Nutrient Management in Onion  | Low Yield due to improper nutrient management  |  
							INM in Onion Treatment: T1:No Fertilizer input T2:FYM 10t/ha +Vermicompost 2t/ha+Groundnut cake-100kg/ha Trichoderma-3kg/ha T3:Farmer practice | Onion ( Variety-Arka Bheem,A.Lalima,Arka Kirthman) | 
							3 | Demo. Plot  | 
						
FISHERIES | 
						||||||
| 1 | Utilisation and feasibility of fish culture in synthetic lined rain water harvesting unit.  | Low water retention capacity of soil in the region. Area with no perennial source of water.
  |  
							Fish culture in synthetic lined rain water harvesting unit  | Fish (semi-intensive culture)
  | 
							1 | B:C ratio 1.6:1
  | 
						
| 2 | Introduction of Jayanthi Rohu in the region under semi-intensive culture system. | Low production and growth performance of conventional IMC and exotic carps. Unavailability of quality fish seed. | 
                          Introduction and popularisation of improved variety of Rohu ( Jayanthi Rohu) | Fish (Jayanthi Rohu / semi-intensive culture system) | 
                          2 | B:C ratio 1.4:1 | 
                        
ANIMAL SCIENCE  | 
                        ||||||
| 1 | Introduction of Hamshire piggery breed | Low carcass yield and growth rate | Growth rate, weight at 10 months, carcass yield | Piggery | 3 | ONGOING | 
| Sl.No. | Title | Problem Diagnosed | Technology Assessed | Crop/Enterprises | No. of Trails | Results | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLANT PROTECTION | 
						||||||
| 1 | Management of shoot borer in Ginger | Severe infestation of shoot borer.  |  
							Assessed  | 
							Ginger  | 
							3 | No. of infested plant =0%  | 
						
| 2 | Management of Rhizome Rot in Ginger | High incidence of Pythium  |  
							Assessed  | Ginger  | 
							3 | No. of infected plant =0%  | 
						
HOME SCIENCE | >
						||||||
| 1 | Value addition in Banana | Lack of awareness on value addition in Banana | Assessed  | Banana  | 
							2 | 500g final product from 800g raw materials  | 
						
AGRONOMY | >
						||||||
| 1 | Varietal performance of Soybean var. Vl Soya-63  | Lack of awareness on improved variety | 1  | soybean  | 
							3 | Yield q/ha: 20  | 
						
| 2 | Finger millet var.MR-1& MR-6 | Lack of awareness on improved variety | 1 | Millet | 3 | Yield q/ha:30 
  | 
						
HORTICULTURE | >
						||||||
| 1 | Varietal Performance of Cauliflower(Pusa Snowball K-1)  | Low yield with existing variety | Varietal Evaluation  | Cauliflower (Pusa Snowball K-1) | 
							3 | Yield /ha – Avg-168 q/ha  | 
						
| 2 | Integrated Nutrient Management in Mandarin Orange  | Low Yield due to improper nutrient management  |  
							INM in Orange Orchard Treatment: T1:No Fertilizer input T2:FYM(250 kgs/ha)/Vermicompost(1000 kgs/ha)+Biofertilizer(25 kgs/ha) + T3:Farmer practice | Mandarin Orange  | 
							2 | Yield /plant (kg)-150  | 
						
| 3 | Integrated Nutrient Management in Turmeric  | Low Yield due to improper nutrient management  |  
							INM in Turmeric Treatment: T1:No Fertilizer input T2:FYM+Vermicompost+Biofertilizer T3:Farmer practice | Turmeric ( Variety-Megha Turmeric-1) | 
							3 | Yield /ha – Avg-168 q/ha  | 
						
FISHERIES | 
						||||||
| 1 | Fish cum poultry cum horticulture unit integration  | Increased cost and Involvement of man power. Feed crops must be sustained for cost cutting.  |  
							Effective utilization of unit area with Fish cum poultry cum horticulture farming.  | Fish, poultry, horticulture unit  | 
							2 | Better utilization of unit area farm  land.  | 
						
| 2 | Rearing of carp seed from fry to fingerlings in scientifically managed backyard ponds  | Unavailability of quality seeds locally.  High management task on feeding and maintaining water quality. High expenditure incurred on external supplementary feeding if locally produced feed ingredient are not used.  |  
							Productive performance of carp seed rearing from fry to fingerlings in backyard ponds  | Fish, carp fry/fingerlings  | 
							2 | Quick returns in short period of culture.  | 
						
| Sl.No. | Title | Problem Diagnosed | Technology Assessed | Crop/Enterprises | No. of Trails | Results | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Backyard Rabbit Farming.  | 
							Poor meat production & high demand for quality meat. | Performance of Rabbit under backyard system. | Rabbit (New Zealand White / Soviet Chinchilla)  | 
							2 | Growth  rate: Avg 1.2 Kg in 3 months  | 
						
| 2 | Enrichment of paddy staw through Urea molasses treatment. | Poor milk production due to feeding of nutritionally imbalanced diet.  |  
							Productive performance of cattle fed upon urea molasses treated paddy straw.  | 
							Dairy  | 
							2 | Milk Yield:   | 
						
| 3 | Varietal Performance of Cauliflower | Low productivity due to non availability of HYV  |  
							Varietal Evaluation  | Cauliflower (Pusa Deepali) | 
							3 | Demo. Plot  | 
						
| 4 | Integrated Nutrient Management in Ginger. | Low Yield due to improper nutrient management | INM in Ginger Treatment: T1:No Fertilizer input T2:FYM+Vermicompost+Biofertilizer T3:Farmer practice | Ginger ( Variety-Nadia) | 
							3 | Demo. Plot Farmer Practice 1.Plant Height(cm)-92 2.No. of tillers/plant-8 3.No. of leaves/plant-210 4. RhizomeYield (qt/ha)-35 | 
						
| 5 | Varietal Performance of Brinjal | Low productivity due to non availability of HYV | Varietal Evaluation  | Brinjal Pant Samrat) | 
							3 | Trial is ongoing  | 
						
| 6 | Integrated Nutrient Management in Mandarin Orange | Low Yield due to improper nutrient management | INM in Orange Orchard Treatment: T1:No Fertilizer input T2:FYM+Vermicompost+Biofertilizer + T3:Farmer practice | Mandarin Orange  | 
							2 |  Trial is ongoing  | 
						
| 7 | Management of Tikka disease in Groundnut.  | Severe incidence of Cercospora leaf spot. | Disease management by using Bordeaux Mixture  | Groundnut  | 
							3 | i)No. of infected plants – 0%  | 
						
| 8 | Management of Termites in Groundnut. | Severe infestation of Termites. | Management of Termites by incorporating Mustard cake during land preparation. | Groundnut  | 
							3 | i)No. of infested plant – 5%  | 
						
| 9 | Varietal performance of lentil  | 
							Lack of awareness on improved variety | Technology  | 
							Lentil | 3 | Technology 
  | 
						
| 10 | Varietal performance of pigeon pea  | Inadequate nutrient management | Technology  | Arhar  | 
							3 | Technology 
  | 
						
| 11 | Composite fish culture  | Poor production and growth performance due to improper management  |  
							Composite culture under semi intensive culture condition | Fish (IMC, exotic) | 
							Yield : 2800 kg/ha  | 
						|
| 12 | Integrated fish farming (fish cum duck)  | High production cost and less income returns  |  
							Integration of khakhi campbell duck breed with semi intensive fish culture.  | Fish – duck integration  | 
							2 | Yield /unit area:2900kg/ha  | 
						
| Sl.No. | Title | Problem Diagnosed | Technology Assessed | Crop/Enterprises | No. of Trails | Results | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Varietal performance of groundnut | Non availability of HYV | Varietal Evaluation | Groundnut (P-11 ) | 
							3 | 
 ( % ): 99 
 Farmers Practice Non existence of local variety | 
						
| 2 | Varietal Performance of Groundnut | Non availability of HYV | Varietal Evaluation | Groundnut   | 
							
 ( % ):99 
 Farmers Practice   | 
						|
| 3 | Effect of Mulching for weed control in Toria | Low Yield due to High Weed Infestation  |  
							Toria (Var TS 38) | 
							3 | T1: 
 (cm)=95 
 T2: 
 T3:Farmers practice 
  | 
						|
| 4 | Management of fruit and shoot borer in Brinjal. | Heavy Infestation of fruit and shoot Borer. | Management of fruit and shoot Borer. | Brinjal | 3 | Use of coriander as trap crop (1:1) Infection %=0.01% | 
						
| 5 | Management of bacterial wilt disease in Tomato. | High incidence of wilting. | Management of bacterial wilt disease. | Chilli and Tomato | 3 | T1-Intercrop Tomato with French  bean.  | 
						
| 6 | Varietal Performance of Broccoli. | Low productivity due to non availability of HYV. | Varietal Evaluation  | Broccoli (Pusa Broccoli KTS-1) | 
							3 | Demo. Plot  | 
						
| 7 | Integrated Nutrient Management in Cabbage  | Low Yield due to improper nutrient management | INM in Cabbage  | Cabbage (F1 Hybrid) | 
							3 | Demo. Plot Farmer Practice 1.Days to emerging Heads-85 days 2.Head weight (gm)-450 3.Harvesting time-120 days 4.Yield (qt/ha)-167 | 
						
| 8 | Varietal Performance of Brinjal. | Low productivity due to non availability of HYV | Varietal Evaluation | Brinjal Pant Samrat) | Trial is ongoing  | 
						|
| 9 | Productive performance of goat by using additional supplements in diet. | Poor productive performance and less economic benefits due to low nutrient feeding system. | Performance of goat fed upon dietary supplementation of Mineral Mixture (AAUVETMIN) | Goat | 2 | Ongoing | 
| 10 | Introduction of improved backyard poultry | Low production of local chicken birds in terms of meat and egg | Backyard Poultry Farming | Poultry (Kuroiler) | 
							2 | Average Body Weight  gain in 10 months: Male: 2.6Kg, Female: 1.8 Kg   | 
						
| 11 | Culture of Indian magur catfish under semi-intensive system | Unavailability of seed on time. High incidence of loss due to escape from earthen ponds Difficulty in harvesting due to burrowing nature |  
							Culture of Indian magur catfish under semi-intensive system | Indian magur | 2 | Avg. wt. of fish at harvest: 190 g  | 
						
| Sl.No. | Title | Problem Diagnosed | Technology Assessed | Crop/Enterprises | No. of Trails | Results | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Management of diamond back moth in cabbage | Heavy infestation | IPM | Cabbage | 3 | i)No.of Moth/sq.m=0.05ii)No.of infected plant/sq.m=0.03iii)Yield/ha=35tonnes/ha.B.C. ratio=2.5:1 | 
| 2 | Management of Phytopthora Rot in Mandarin Orange | High incidence | IDM | Mandarin Orange | 3 | i)No.of wilted plants/sq.m=0.1II)Yield/ha=28q/haB.C. ratio=2.8:1 | 
| 3 | Introduction of Kamrupa poultry | Low Production | Kamrupa Poultry | 4 | 1.Two months avg. body weight 200g2. No mortality upto 2 months of age.(Trial is ongoing) | |
| 4 | Introduction of Broiler Rabbit in backyard farming | Demand of high value meat | Rabbit(NZW) | 2 | Trial is not success due to high mortality | |
| 5 | Varietal performance of Tomato(Var.Kashi Vishesh) | Low yield of existing tomato | Varietal evaluation of tomato | Tomato | 3 | Demo.PlotPlant Height (cm) Avg: 85No. of fruit/ plant Avg: 15Fruit wt(g) Avg 60Yield (q/ha)Avg: 350 | 
| 7 | Integrated nutrient management | Low yield of existing Cauliflower | INM in cauliflower | Cauliflower | 3 | Demo.Plot:Days to emerging curds-Avg-75 daysCurd weight-Avg-540gHarvesting time-Avg-90 daysYield/ha – Avg-200 q/haB:C =3:1 | 
| 8 | Introduction of HYV in Banana Var.Dwarf cavendish | Low yield of existing Banana | Varietal Evaluation | Banana | 3 | Demo.PlotPlant Height(mtrs)-Avg-1.5Month required from flowering to fruting stage-9-12 monthYield /ha-Avg-20 t/ha B:C=3.5:1 | 
| 9 | Management of fruit drop control in orange orchard | Fruit drop for low yielding due to lack of management | Fruit drop control in Orange Orchard | Orange | 3 | Fruit length(cm)-Avg-5.3Fruit width(cm)-Avg-6.1No,of fruit/plant-Avg-320Yield/ha-Avg-8.9 Mt/haDemo - 3:1 | 
| 10 | Drudgery Reduction | High drudgery involvementLabor scarcity | 2 | Paddy | 2 | Production:300 kgsMandays:3 days/haB:C =12:1 | 
| 11 | Tie & Dye | Lack of knowledge on utilization of dye | 2 | Dye Plant | 2 | Resistance to light :50%/yearColour fastness to washing: 60%/yearColour fastness to iron :95% B.C. - 2.25:1 | 
| 12 | Performance of carps fed upon with fish grow premix as feed additive | Poor Production High production cost | Feeding Management | Fish(carps) | 3 | Yield: 16 qt/ha/yrAvg. wt. at harvest: 530 gSurvival Rate:80%B.C. - 1.4:1 | 
| 13 | Culture of Indian Magur catfish in semi-intensive system | Fish farming confined to culture of carp species only | Culture of catfish (Indian Magur) | Catfish (Indian Magur) | 3 | 1. Yield : 800 kg/200 sq. m concrete tank2. Avg. wt. of fish at harvest: 194 g3. SurvivaL Rate : 90%4. disease/pest occurrence : nil B.C. - 2.4:1 | 
| 14 | Varietal performance of Toria variety TS-38 | Low yield due to lack of awareness on improved variety | Technology:Toria Variety TS-38Local check:Local variety | Toria | 3 | Technology:Time of sowing :Mid of OctoberPlant height (cm):99.5No. of Pods /plant:220.6Days of maturity:170No. of branches/plant:9.5Yield kg/ha:750Local check:Time of sowing :1st week of NovemberPlant height (cm):116No. of Pods /plant:210Days of maturity:150No. of branches/plant:6.33Yield kg/ha:520 | 
| 15 | Application of Azotobacter in toria Var. TS-36 & TS-38 | Inadequate nutrient management | Technology:Seed treatment with Azotobacter @20gm/kgControl:No seed treatment with Azotobacter | Toria | 3 | Technology:Time of sowing :Both the Toria var.TS-36 & TS-38 are sown in Mid of OctoberPlant height (cm):99.5/8.5(TS-38/TS-36)No. of Pods /plant:220.7/211.1(TS-38/TS-36)Days of maturity:170/100(TS-38/TS-36)No. of branches/plant:10/9.5(TS-38/TS-36)Yield kg/ha:755/905(TS-38/TS-36)ControlYield kg/ha:755/860(TS-38/TS-36)Technology: 3.7Control:3.5 | 
| 16 | Evaluation of Rice-Toria –Potato cropping system | Low yield and lower economic return due monocropping | Technology: T1:Sole crop of riceT2:Sole crop of ToriaT3:Sole crop of potatoT4:Rice-toria-potato | Paddy - Toria - Potato | 3 | T1: Average plant height(cm)=190.2Average no. of tillers=12.4Average no. of panicles=24.91Potato Equivalent Yield q/ha=146(64.9)T2: Average plant height(cm)=109.2Average no. of pods per plant=201.5Average no. of branches per plant=9.5Length of pod(cm)=5Nos. of seeds per pod=10Potato Equivalent Yield q/ha=67(12)T3: Average plant height(cm)=38.9Average no. of shoots per hill=4.98Average no. of stolon per plant=7.92Stolon length (cm)=7.95Average nos. of  tuber per plant=7.9Potato Equivalent Yield q/ha=107T4: Equivalent Yield q/ha:320 B.C. Ratio T1:2.9T2:4.1 T3:2.4T4:9.4  | 
						
