ON-Farm Testing
Sl.No. | Title | Problem Diagnosed | Technology Assessed | Crop/Enterprises | No. of Trails | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLANT PROTECTION |
||||||
1 | Management of Trunk borer in Mandarin Orange. | Severe infestation of Trunk Borer |
1. Inject 5ml petrol and insert petrol soaked cotton and close it with wet mud in a bored holes of the tree trunk. |
Mandarin Orange |
3 | 1.No. of infested =10 2.Fruits/tree=650 3.Yield/tree(kg)=90 4.B.C Ratio=6:1 |
2 | Management of Fruit sucking moth in Mandarin Orange. |
Severe infestation of Fruit sucking moth. |
1.Preparation of lures by mixing 20ml chlorpyriphos+
| Mandarin Orange |
3 | 1. Damaged fruits/tree=80 2.Fruits/tree=580 3.Yield/tree(kg)=70 4.B.C.Ratio=4:1 |
HOME SCIENCE | >
||||||
1 | Working Principe of Zero Energy Cool Chamber | Dure to erratic power supplybat village cannot store the perishable fruitsband vegetables for longer periods. Refrigerators are costlier tahn zecc but lower in capacity |
Storage techniques |
Perishable fruits and vegetables |
2 | Fruits and vegetables can be store for longer durations. Shelf life increases |
2 | Post harvest processing of Banana | No value addition in raw banana | Value addition | Banana | 3 | Yield:1kg raw banan agives 600g of Chips |
3 | Post harvest processing of Soyabean | Low utilization of farm produce. | Value addition | Soyabean | 2 | Yield:1kg grain gives 300ml of milk |
AGRONOMY | >
||||||
1 | Varietal performance of Groundnut (Var.K-6) | Low productivity due to non availability of HYV | Varietal evaluation | Groundnut
|
3 | 1.Germination( % ): 99 |
2 | Varietal Performance of Greengram Var IPM-2-14 |
Low productivity due to non availability of HYV | Varietal evaluation |
Green gram | 3 | 1.Germination (%) : 99 |
3 | Varietal Performance of Quality Protein Maize( Variety HQPM 1) | Low yield and less economic benefits with local variety |
Varietal evaluation |
Maize | 3 | 1.Method of Sowing: line sowing
|
HORTICULTURE | >
||||||
1 | Varietal Performance of Okra(Kashi Kranti & Kashi Pragati) |
Low yield of existing local variety | Varietal Evaluation | Okra |
3 | Demo. Plot |
2 | Integrated Nutrient Management in Mandarin Orange | Low Yield due to improper nutrient management | INM in Orange Orchard Treatment: T1:No Fertilizer input T2:FYM(250 kgs/ha)/Vermicompost(20 qt/ha) Lime-2kg/plant+Plant growth regulator T3:Farmer practice |
Mandarin Orange |
2 | Demo.Plot |
3 | Integrated Nutrient Management in Onion | Low Yield due to improper nutrient management |
INM in Onion Treatment: T1:No Fertilizer input T2:FYM 10t/ha +Vermicompost 2t/ha+Groundnut cake-100kg/ha Trichoderma-3kg/ha T3:Farmer practice | Onion ( Variety-Arka Bheem,A.Lalima,Arka Kirthman) |
3 | Demo. Plot |
FISHERIES |
||||||
1 | Utilisation and feasibility of fish culture in synthetic lined rain water harvesting unit. | Low water retention capacity of soil in the region. Area with no perennial source of water.
|
Fish culture in synthetic lined rain water harvesting unit | Fish (semi-intensive culture)
|
1 | B:C ratio 1.6:1
|
2 | Introduction of Jayanthi Rohu in the region under semi-intensive culture system. | Low production and growth performance of conventional IMC and exotic carps. Unavailability of quality fish seed. |
Introduction and popularisation of improved variety of Rohu ( Jayanthi Rohu) | Fish (Jayanthi Rohu / semi-intensive culture system) |
2 | B:C ratio 1.4:1 |
ANIMAL SCIENCE |
||||||
1 | Introduction of Hamshire piggery breed | Low carcass yield and growth rate | Growth rate, weight at 10 months, carcass yield | Piggery | 3 | ONGOING |
Sl.No. | Title | Problem Diagnosed | Technology Assessed | Crop/Enterprises | No. of Trails | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLANT PROTECTION |
||||||
1 | Management of shoot borer in Ginger | Severe infestation of shoot borer. |
Assessed |
Ginger |
3 | No. of infested plant =0% |
2 | Management of Rhizome Rot in Ginger | High incidence of Pythium |
Assessed | Ginger |
3 | No. of infected plant =0% |
HOME SCIENCE | >
||||||
1 | Value addition in Banana | Lack of awareness on value addition in Banana | Assessed | Banana |
2 | 500g final product from 800g raw materials |
AGRONOMY | >
||||||
1 | Varietal performance of Soybean var. Vl Soya-63 | Lack of awareness on improved variety | 1 | soybean |
3 | Yield q/ha: 20 |
2 | Finger millet var.MR-1& MR-6 | Lack of awareness on improved variety | 1 | Millet | 3 | Yield q/ha:30
|
HORTICULTURE | >
||||||
1 | Varietal Performance of Cauliflower(Pusa Snowball K-1) | Low yield with existing variety | Varietal Evaluation | Cauliflower (Pusa Snowball K-1) |
3 | Yield /ha – Avg-168 q/ha |
2 | Integrated Nutrient Management in Mandarin Orange | Low Yield due to improper nutrient management |
INM in Orange Orchard Treatment: T1:No Fertilizer input T2:FYM(250 kgs/ha)/Vermicompost(1000 kgs/ha)+Biofertilizer(25 kgs/ha) + T3:Farmer practice | Mandarin Orange |
2 | Yield /plant (kg)-150 |
3 | Integrated Nutrient Management in Turmeric | Low Yield due to improper nutrient management |
INM in Turmeric Treatment: T1:No Fertilizer input T2:FYM+Vermicompost+Biofertilizer T3:Farmer practice | Turmeric ( Variety-Megha Turmeric-1) |
3 | Yield /ha – Avg-168 q/ha |
FISHERIES |
||||||
1 | Fish cum poultry cum horticulture unit integration | Increased cost and Involvement of man power. Feed crops must be sustained for cost cutting. |
Effective utilization of unit area with Fish cum poultry cum horticulture farming. | Fish, poultry, horticulture unit |
2 | Better utilization of unit area farm land. |
2 | Rearing of carp seed from fry to fingerlings in scientifically managed backyard ponds | Unavailability of quality seeds locally. High management task on feeding and maintaining water quality. High expenditure incurred on external supplementary feeding if locally produced feed ingredient are not used. |
Productive performance of carp seed rearing from fry to fingerlings in backyard ponds | Fish, carp fry/fingerlings |
2 | Quick returns in short period of culture. |
Sl.No. | Title | Problem Diagnosed | Technology Assessed | Crop/Enterprises | No. of Trails | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Backyard Rabbit Farming. |
Poor meat production & high demand for quality meat. | Performance of Rabbit under backyard system. | Rabbit (New Zealand White / Soviet Chinchilla) |
2 | Growth rate: Avg 1.2 Kg in 3 months |
2 | Enrichment of paddy staw through Urea molasses treatment. | Poor milk production due to feeding of nutritionally imbalanced diet. |
Productive performance of cattle fed upon urea molasses treated paddy straw. |
Dairy |
2 | Milk Yield: |
3 | Varietal Performance of Cauliflower | Low productivity due to non availability of HYV |
Varietal Evaluation | Cauliflower (Pusa Deepali) |
3 | Demo. Plot |
4 | Integrated Nutrient Management in Ginger. | Low Yield due to improper nutrient management | INM in Ginger Treatment: T1:No Fertilizer input T2:FYM+Vermicompost+Biofertilizer T3:Farmer practice | Ginger ( Variety-Nadia) |
3 | Demo. Plot Farmer Practice 1.Plant Height(cm)-92 2.No. of tillers/plant-8 3.No. of leaves/plant-210 4. RhizomeYield (qt/ha)-35 |
5 | Varietal Performance of Brinjal | Low productivity due to non availability of HYV | Varietal Evaluation | Brinjal Pant Samrat) |
3 | Trial is ongoing |
6 | Integrated Nutrient Management in Mandarin Orange | Low Yield due to improper nutrient management | INM in Orange Orchard Treatment: T1:No Fertilizer input T2:FYM+Vermicompost+Biofertilizer + T3:Farmer practice | Mandarin Orange |
2 | Trial is ongoing |
7 | Management of Tikka disease in Groundnut. | Severe incidence of Cercospora leaf spot. | Disease management by using Bordeaux Mixture | Groundnut |
3 | i)No. of infected plants – 0% |
8 | Management of Termites in Groundnut. | Severe infestation of Termites. | Management of Termites by incorporating Mustard cake during land preparation. | Groundnut |
3 | i)No. of infested plant – 5% |
9 | Varietal performance of lentil |
Lack of awareness on improved variety | Technology |
Lentil | 3 | Technology
|
10 | Varietal performance of pigeon pea | Inadequate nutrient management | Technology | Arhar |
3 | Technology
|
11 | Composite fish culture | Poor production and growth performance due to improper management |
Composite culture under semi intensive culture condition | Fish (IMC, exotic) |
Yield : 2800 kg/ha |
|
12 | Integrated fish farming (fish cum duck) | High production cost and less income returns |
Integration of khakhi campbell duck breed with semi intensive fish culture. | Fish – duck integration |
2 | Yield /unit area:2900kg/ha |
Sl.No. | Title | Problem Diagnosed | Technology Assessed | Crop/Enterprises | No. of Trails | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Varietal performance of groundnut | Non availability of HYV | Varietal Evaluation | Groundnut (P-11 ) |
3 |
( % ): 99
Farmers Practice Non existence of local variety |
2 | Varietal Performance of Groundnut | Non availability of HYV | Varietal Evaluation | Groundnut |
( % ):99
Farmers Practice |
|
3 | Effect of Mulching for weed control in Toria | Low Yield due to High Weed Infestation |
Toria (Var TS 38) |
3 | T1:
(cm)=95
T2:
T3:Farmers practice
|
|
4 | Management of fruit and shoot borer in Brinjal. | Heavy Infestation of fruit and shoot Borer. | Management of fruit and shoot Borer. | Brinjal | 3 | Use of coriander as trap crop (1:1) Infection %=0.01% |
5 | Management of bacterial wilt disease in Tomato. | High incidence of wilting. | Management of bacterial wilt disease. | Chilli and Tomato | 3 | T1-Intercrop Tomato with French bean. |
6 | Varietal Performance of Broccoli. | Low productivity due to non availability of HYV. | Varietal Evaluation | Broccoli (Pusa Broccoli KTS-1) |
3 | Demo. Plot |
7 | Integrated Nutrient Management in Cabbage | Low Yield due to improper nutrient management | INM in Cabbage | Cabbage (F1 Hybrid) |
3 | Demo. Plot Farmer Practice 1.Days to emerging Heads-85 days 2.Head weight (gm)-450 3.Harvesting time-120 days 4.Yield (qt/ha)-167 |
8 | Varietal Performance of Brinjal. | Low productivity due to non availability of HYV | Varietal Evaluation | Brinjal Pant Samrat) | Trial is ongoing |
|
9 | Productive performance of goat by using additional supplements in diet. | Poor productive performance and less economic benefits due to low nutrient feeding system. | Performance of goat fed upon dietary supplementation of Mineral Mixture (AAUVETMIN) | Goat | 2 | Ongoing |
10 | Introduction of improved backyard poultry | Low production of local chicken birds in terms of meat and egg | Backyard Poultry Farming | Poultry (Kuroiler) |
2 | Average Body Weight gain in 10 months: Male: 2.6Kg, Female: 1.8 Kg |
11 | Culture of Indian magur catfish under semi-intensive system | Unavailability of seed on time. High incidence of loss due to escape from earthen ponds Difficulty in harvesting due to burrowing nature |
Culture of Indian magur catfish under semi-intensive system | Indian magur | 2 | Avg. wt. of fish at harvest: 190 g |
Sl.No. | Title | Problem Diagnosed | Technology Assessed | Crop/Enterprises | No. of Trails | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Management of diamond back moth in cabbage | Heavy infestation | IPM | Cabbage | 3 | i)No.of Moth/sq.m=0.05ii)No.of infected plant/sq.m=0.03iii)Yield/ha=35tonnes/ha.B.C. ratio=2.5:1 |
2 | Management of Phytopthora Rot in Mandarin Orange | High incidence | IDM | Mandarin Orange | 3 | i)No.of wilted plants/sq.m=0.1II)Yield/ha=28q/haB.C. ratio=2.8:1 |
3 | Introduction of Kamrupa poultry | Low Production | Kamrupa Poultry | 4 | 1.Two months avg. body weight 200g2. No mortality upto 2 months of age.(Trial is ongoing) | |
4 | Introduction of Broiler Rabbit in backyard farming | Demand of high value meat | Rabbit(NZW) | 2 | Trial is not success due to high mortality | |
5 | Varietal performance of Tomato(Var.Kashi Vishesh) | Low yield of existing tomato | Varietal evaluation of tomato | Tomato | 3 | Demo.PlotPlant Height (cm) Avg: 85No. of fruit/ plant Avg: 15Fruit wt(g) Avg 60Yield (q/ha)Avg: 350 |
7 | Integrated nutrient management | Low yield of existing Cauliflower | INM in cauliflower | Cauliflower | 3 | Demo.Plot:Days to emerging curds-Avg-75 daysCurd weight-Avg-540gHarvesting time-Avg-90 daysYield/ha – Avg-200 q/haB:C =3:1 |
8 | Introduction of HYV in Banana Var.Dwarf cavendish | Low yield of existing Banana | Varietal Evaluation | Banana | 3 | Demo.PlotPlant Height(mtrs)-Avg-1.5Month required from flowering to fruting stage-9-12 monthYield /ha-Avg-20 t/ha B:C=3.5:1 |
9 | Management of fruit drop control in orange orchard | Fruit drop for low yielding due to lack of management | Fruit drop control in Orange Orchard | Orange | 3 | Fruit length(cm)-Avg-5.3Fruit width(cm)-Avg-6.1No,of fruit/plant-Avg-320Yield/ha-Avg-8.9 Mt/haDemo - 3:1 |
10 | Drudgery Reduction | High drudgery involvementLabor scarcity | 2 | Paddy | 2 | Production:300 kgsMandays:3 days/haB:C =12:1 |
11 | Tie & Dye | Lack of knowledge on utilization of dye | 2 | Dye Plant | 2 | Resistance to light :50%/yearColour fastness to washing: 60%/yearColour fastness to iron :95% B.C. - 2.25:1 |
12 | Performance of carps fed upon with fish grow premix as feed additive | Poor Production High production cost | Feeding Management | Fish(carps) | 3 | Yield: 16 qt/ha/yrAvg. wt. at harvest: 530 gSurvival Rate:80%B.C. - 1.4:1 |
13 | Culture of Indian Magur catfish in semi-intensive system | Fish farming confined to culture of carp species only | Culture of catfish (Indian Magur) | Catfish (Indian Magur) | 3 | 1. Yield : 800 kg/200 sq. m concrete tank2. Avg. wt. of fish at harvest: 194 g3. SurvivaL Rate : 90%4. disease/pest occurrence : nil B.C. - 2.4:1 |
14 | Varietal performance of Toria variety TS-38 | Low yield due to lack of awareness on improved variety | Technology:Toria Variety TS-38Local check:Local variety | Toria | 3 | Technology:Time of sowing :Mid of OctoberPlant height (cm):99.5No. of Pods /plant:220.6Days of maturity:170No. of branches/plant:9.5Yield kg/ha:750Local check:Time of sowing :1st week of NovemberPlant height (cm):116No. of Pods /plant:210Days of maturity:150No. of branches/plant:6.33Yield kg/ha:520 |
15 | Application of Azotobacter in toria Var. TS-36 & TS-38 | Inadequate nutrient management | Technology:Seed treatment with Azotobacter @20gm/kgControl:No seed treatment with Azotobacter | Toria | 3 | Technology:Time of sowing :Both the Toria var.TS-36 & TS-38 are sown in Mid of OctoberPlant height (cm):99.5/8.5(TS-38/TS-36)No. of Pods /plant:220.7/211.1(TS-38/TS-36)Days of maturity:170/100(TS-38/TS-36)No. of branches/plant:10/9.5(TS-38/TS-36)Yield kg/ha:755/905(TS-38/TS-36)ControlYield kg/ha:755/860(TS-38/TS-36)Technology: 3.7Control:3.5 |
16 | Evaluation of Rice-Toria –Potato cropping system | Low yield and lower economic return due monocropping | Technology: T1:Sole crop of riceT2:Sole crop of ToriaT3:Sole crop of potatoT4:Rice-toria-potato | Paddy - Toria - Potato | 3 | T1: Average plant height(cm)=190.2Average no. of tillers=12.4Average no. of panicles=24.91Potato Equivalent Yield q/ha=146(64.9)T2: Average plant height(cm)=109.2Average no. of pods per plant=201.5Average no. of branches per plant=9.5Length of pod(cm)=5Nos. of seeds per pod=10Potato Equivalent Yield q/ha=67(12)T3: Average plant height(cm)=38.9Average no. of shoots per hill=4.98Average no. of stolon per plant=7.92Stolon length (cm)=7.95Average nos. of tuber per plant=7.9Potato Equivalent Yield q/ha=107T4: Equivalent Yield q/ha:320 B.C. Ratio T1:2.9T2:4.1 T3:2.4T4:9.4 |